Which is the best virtual reality headset for your needs?

Virtual reality has advanced by leaps and bounds, with such a wide range of options that choosing can be difficult. From budget-friendly models to high-end equipment, each VR headset is designed for a different type of user. In this comparison, we analyze the main models on the market— Meta Quest 3S, Pimax Crystal Light, Pimax Crystal Super, Apple Vision Pro, PlayStation VR2, Pico 4 Ultra, and Meta Quest 3 —highlighting their strengths and the type of experience they offer.

Best value VR headset: Meta Quest 3S

The Meta Quest 3S has become the ideal entry point to virtual reality. Starting at €345.90 , it offers a resolution of 1832 × 1920 pixels per eye and approximately 20 pixels per degree (PPD) .
They feature the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 , the same chip found in higher-end headsets, and boast full-color mixed reality , area recognition, and a huge catalog of games.

• Advantages: excellent balance between price, performance and accessibility.

• Disadvantages: they use Fresnel lenses, which are somewhat outdated, and their field of view (≈ 100º) is somewhat limited.

Perfect for users looking for their first viewer or an affordable model without sacrificing quality.

Best visor for simulation: Pimax Crystal Light

If your priority is visual immersion in flight or driving simulators, the Pimax Crystal Light headset is the best choice. Its resolution of 2880 × 2880 pixels per eye (≈ 35 PPD) provides outstanding sharpness and a 104º horizontal field of view .
The direct connection to the PC via DisplayPort eliminates latency and compression problems.

• Advantages: high visual fidelity, no delay or loss of quality.

• Disadvantages: They require a powerful PC and fixed cabling.

• Approximate price: €800.

A high-end option with excellent value for money for simulation enthusiasts.

Highest resolution on the market: Pimax Crystal Super

The Pimax Crystal Super represents the pinnacle of current VR technology. Its 3840 × 3840 pixel resolution per eye and modular design allow it to reach up to 57 PPD , approaching the resolution of the human eye .
They also offer interchangeable lens options to expand the field of view up to 140º.

• Advantages: unmatched visual quality, customization, and extreme detail.

• Disadvantages: They require very high-end hardware (RTX 5090 recommended) and their price is high.

Only recommended for enthusiasts seeking the ultimate in visual excellence.

Best viewer for spatial computing and multimedia: Apple Vision Pro

The Apple Vision Pro redefines the concept of mixed reality. They incorporate Micro-OLED displays with a resolution of 3660 × 3200 pixels , reaching between 35 and 45 PPI , ideal for high-definition text and video.
Its system integrates eye and face tracking, LiDAR sensors, and perfect synchronization with the Apple ecosystem thanks to the M5 chip.

• Advantages: immersive experience, full integration with Apple devices, exceptional image and sound quality.

• Disadvantages: high price (around €4600).

A reference device for professional users or advanced multimedia content users.

Best VR headset for PS5 and PC: PlayStation VR2

The PlayStation VR2 combines OLED panels with deep blacks and a resolution of 2000 × 2040 pixels per eye (≈ 24 PPD).
They work natively with PlayStation 5 and can also connect to PC, offering versatility for gaming and VR experiences.

• Advantages: excellent contrast, good visual quality and console support.

• Disadvantages: Fresnel lenses, slight mura effect, and high price relative to the hardware.

Recommended for those who already own a PS5 and want to enjoy VR without complications.

Best budget headset with body tracking: Pico 4 Ultra

The Pico 4 Ultra stands out for including compatibility with full body tracking using additional sensors.
They integrate the Snapdragon XR2 Gen 2 , a resolution of 2160 × 2160 pixels per eye and a field of view of 105º .

• Advantages: high power, good image quality and low-cost body tracking option.

• Disadvantages: still limited ecosystem and smaller game catalog than Meta.

• Estimated price: €599.

A solid alternative for users seeking body realism in social or fitness VR experiences.

Best all-terrain headset: Meta Quest 3

The Meta Quest 3 represents the perfect balance between performance, quality and versatility.
They feature two LCD panels with 2064 × 2208 pixels , 25 PPD , a 110º field of view, and the XR2 Gen 2 processor.
They are compatible with standalone games, PCVR, and full-color mixed reality experiences.

• Advantages: excellent pancake lenses, robust ecosystem, good resolution, and continuous support.

• Disadvantages: average price (€549) and dependence on Meta software.

The most balanced and versatile viewfinder of 2025, ideal for those seeking a complete experience without sacrificing quality.

Final conclusions

General verdict

• If you're looking for an affordable and accessible option , the Meta Quest 3S is the most recommended.

• For demanding simulators , Pimax Crystal Light is the most balanced choice.

• Those who appreciate visual detail will find their paradise in the Pimax Crystal Super.

• In the professional or multimedia world, Apple Vision Pro is the absolute benchmark.

• For mixed use between console and PC , the PlayStation VR2 remains a solid alternative.

• If you want body tracking without spending too much, the Pico 4 Ultra fits the bill perfectly.

• And if you prefer total versatility , the Meta Quest 3 will dominate the market in 2025.